On Beauty

April 22, 2012 § Leave a comment

There is a fundamental problem with “On Beauty”:  and it is illustrated by the instance of “Bach sounding like a sewing machine sometimes”:  Mothersill isn’t an connoisseur of the arts she uses as her examples — and is therefore bound to misunderstand how one perceives or evaluates beauty in those arts, and therefore — in general.

Perhaps there are two fundamental problems with it:  the second being that although I think I have come to understand a good deal about value judgments in art — certainly more than the book’s author does — yet I no longer care to share what I have learned — and therefore to put it in writing, and therefore to systematize it; and therefore my knowledge — experience is the better word, as the skill isn’t sufficiently explicit — will remain inchoate, felt and practiced, but unconceptualized, undescribed, untheorized, untaught.

Aesthetics shall remain in darkness.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

What’s this?

You are currently reading On Beauty at Ceudelis.


%d bloggers like this: